I’m back and hope to return soon to a state of normal. I want to sleep 7 to 8 hours a night again instead of five. I want to visit your blogs again, and respond to your comments and emails. I want a massage.
My second practicum was not like my first. The week of practice teaching I did at the end of Part I of the course was with a class of Level Three LINC students. From the very first time my mentor sat me down after the school day to give me feedback, I heard almost nothing but praise, though the kudos were interspersed with a couple of gentle suggestions on how to make my already amazing teaching even better. At the end of that week, she gave me the third of three possible grades: Unacceptable, Pass, Pass with Distinction.
Wanting to give myself a bit more of a challenge, I volunteered to do my second practicum with Level One students. I had heard stories of how many LINC teachers there are out there who refuse to teach that level, or who–if forced to rotate into that level every few months–hate it and/or cannot hack it. It takes a very special type to teach this level well. With my mind on future job interviews, I wanted to know if I am one of those who has what it takes to teach Level One. It would be a nice feather for my hat to be able to tell a prospective employer, “Oh, and by the way, I can teach One.”
By day two of my practicum, I was questioning my sanity. What WAS I thinking? Paired with the difficulty of teaching this level was the fact that the mentor teachers are asked to raise the bar on those of us who have already been through one practicum. My mentor took her job very seriously.
My first mentor had come to trust me enough by day three that she was leaving the classroom to do her one-on-one testing. This woman, on the other hand, sat and made notes the entire time. She brought my attention to every area where I could possibly have done things more effectively.
One thing I found very difficult was designing a lesson that would challenge them just enough without leaving them feeling discouraged. The goal was to find that perfect balance: you want to give them exercises at which they can succeed, especially early in the lesson, but you don’t want to give them material that is too easy. They will get bored, lose interest, speed through it too quickly. Adding to the trickiness of this was the fact that my class was effectively multi-level. One of the eleven student was clearly ready to move onto Level Two in a couple of weeks, while three students had been allowed to join the class that week and had no idea what was going on around them. I had to make sure the lessons had some value for the newcomers while having many aspects challenging enough for the highest achievers.
The other daunting and time-consuming thing for a brand new teacher is finding a variety of ways to present material. In our course, we learn a few of the tried and true activities, like jig-saw text (students must put words or sentences in the correct order), blank-fill exercises, circle the whatever, find the error, chain drill. We also learn how to lead a few of the games that most ESL teachers use: Bingo, tic-tac-toe on the blackboard, twenty questions, and so on. But you definitely don’t get your bag of tricks full enough for a week of teaching two lessons a day without re-using some templates a few times through the week.
I had even been proactive enough to have filled a two-page table in Word with game ideas I’d collected from ESL websites over a two-month period. Yet on those nights when I needed a game for the following day’s afternoon activity, I found myself scrolling through the whole list and coming up empty handed. None of the games would work with Level Ones, who just don’t know enough words to convey any but the most basic ideas. To give you an idea of their language level, if someone was going to be absent, she might say to me, “Me 10:30 doctor.” We mostly communicated through gesture and the commonest of nouns.
When I did a lesson on pronunciation of vowels, I wrote on the board “a e i o u.” I then pointed to the Columbian student and said,” Spanish has 5 vowels. One letter (hold up one finger), one sound (touch ear).” English has 5 letters, 12 sounds.” I wrote the number 12 on the board and pointed to my ear again. Even the new student from China who couldn’t yet tell me her street address followed that lesson. We practiced lax and tense vowels that day using minimal pairs: ship/sheep, bet/bait, pull/pool. I passed out rubber bands, which we stretched out while saying the tense vowels (sheep, bait, pool).
My mentor was hard on me, but in the end it is a good thing that she made me dig deep.
I went into the practicum “knowing” that I am literal minded, detail oriented and sometimes too formulaic in my way of learning, teaching, thinking. By “knowing,” I mean that I have been told, it has been pointed out to me and I believe it. But knowing is one thing. Being able to address it is another. She was able to show me how these quirks come out in my teaching and how I could be more effective in the classroom if I can break through these mental molds of mine before they become habits. I don’t want to fossilize before I’ve even begun and just say, “Oh, that’s my teaching style.” She showed me how much the students could benefit if I can sometimes pull my head up out of the land of details and see the big picture…get my head out of the formula to see why the formula was put there in the first place.
I’ll give you an example.
To check our answers on one activity where students had just put some sentences in order, I asked the students to come put the right answers on the board. I did that because I wanted to inject some physical movement into our morning, get their blood flowing, and let everyone see as we corrected them. We did that with five sentences. “She is kind.” “He is a mail carrier,” etc.
Then we put five questions in order using the little bits of coloured paper I had cut up the night before. “Is he a mail carrier?” “Is she kind?”
My mentor challenged me on why I had them come to the board. My answer, “just to change it up,” wasn’t a good one. She wanted me to realize that coming up to the board is time-consuming, so you only want to do it that way when there is a reason, one that has value for the students. Otherwise you are using up time that could better be used on a phase of the lesson where you might run short of time.
She had me think hard about every single choice I made in that same way. If we took up the answers one by one, she pointed out that we could have checked those answers chorally. Why? Because by walking around the class, I could have seen that almost everyone had the answers right. It was an easy exercise for them. No need to go around the room. You’re taking time away from the last part of the lesson, which is the most valuable part–the production phase when they actually use the new language to communicate freely with you and one another.
In another instance she pointed out that by walking around and looking at their papers, I could have seen that they all had the right answers. No need to waste time taking that one up at all. Just say, “I see you all have gotten these all right, so let’s move on.”
My head was stuck in formulas. You hand out a worksheet, you check it (with a partner, with the class). She was trying to pull me out into reality. Stay tuned into the students. What is really happening and what are the implications for how you conduct the rest of the lesson? Can you veer from the formula now, given what is happening? Should you? Must you?
My first mentor had praised me for being “very flexible” and present. This mentor was able to show me where I was not present, not tuned into what was really happening.
With this kind of guidance, I was able to push myself every night to address her new concerns. By Friday, I felt like I’d been through teaching boot camp. Though on day one I had not even liked her very much, by the end of the week I felt grateful to her for taking her role so seriously and pushing me so hard. Had she not been so conscientious, I would not have gotten a fraction of the benefit from that experience.
It was hard, and I’m glad it’s over. But I’m also really glad I chose a tough assignment and had a strict task master.